That
pretty much sums up HOW I BECAME A SCIENCE FICTION FAN. Its now
nearly four decades later and I’m still reading that stuff.
My origins as a fan don’t inform on just how immersed I
became. A quote from my brother may serve to convey some small
sense of just how infatuated and fanatical I had become: “science
fiction, science fiction, science fiction, that’s all you
ever talk about!.” He continually shortened and refined
this epithet over the years such that eventually all he had to
do was mutter ‘science fiction’ and shake his head
to get the point across.
Nothing
previously said details my involvement with collecting science
fiction (I have over 3,000 volumes in the personal collection,
many, many Volume one, Number one Science Fiction pulp magazines
– about 63% of all the English language SF & Fantasy
pulps) a huge collection of SF anthologies (including first printings
of the three books considered to be the ‘first’ SF
anthologies), nor does it relate my fannish activities (running
a Hugo Banquet at the 1977 Worldcon, publishing fanzines, taking
cross-country trips with other fen, being declared both a SMOF
and a non-existent person at the same convention) or the review
work I did of SF films for my college paper (I got to attend the
premieres of Star Wars, Close Encounters, Logan’s Run, and
several others), nor my historical research (based at least on
the letter column in Amazing Stories magazine I’m somewhat
of an amateur SF historian) nor the SF games I developed during
the 80’s.
Nor
does it explain what’s up with A. Bertram Chandler. I know
its been the long way around. Everything that I just told you
plays its part in what’s coming next. You’ve made
it this far and the worst you'll encounter is yet more personal
history in glorious boring detail, so why not just relax to the
inevitable and finish it off?
As
was mentioned earlier, I happened upon A. Bertram Chandler as
a third-choice replacement for Heinlein. (NOT a ranking of importance
or enjoyment, but simple sequential circumstance.) Now, mind you
that this was at a time when my only experience with science fiction
literature was a few of the classics (Wells, Verne), a couple
of scholastic book selections (Del Rey and Keyes) and the aforementioned
Grand Master.
This
was well before I had learned anything about science fiction.
All I knew was that it was the thing that made the lights inside
my head go off. Man had just landed on the Moon. What I was reading
was the next logical step. Lunar Lem to the Asgard. I’ll
vacation with the saurians on Venus and next month ride a Torch
Ship to one of the new colonies – or maybe step through
a gate and homestead a new planet… When I grow up, I’ll
be an astronaut and work on Mars…
I
certainly didn’t know that science fiction was so complicated.
I’d yet to hear the expression ‘willing suspension
of disbelief’. I had no idea that there was a Golden Age.
I didn’t know that there was as yet not a single universally
accepted definition for the genre. I didn’t know the word
genre! The New Wave was cresting and I’d never seen the
old wave. (Fortunately I didn’t know at the time that we’d
stop going to the Moon in a few short months.)
Once
I began attending science fiction conventions and discoursing
with my more learned brethren (I attended my first convention
at the age of 13, Philcon at the ill-fated Mayflower Hotel, home
of Legionaires Disease) I quickly found out that while R.A.H.
was very highly regarded, as was LeGuin, (with RAH considered
to be almost on a par with Verne and Wells - his ‘Grandmaster’
title was only just beginning to be used on a regular basis) Captain
Mr. Chandler was considered a bit of a space opera hack. (Bradley
was considered a bit of a novelty for being a woman – as
was LeGuin – but this was before Marion’s career produced
The Mists of Avalon and if anything, her work at the time was
also regarded as nearly as space operatic as Chandler’s
was).
This
genuinely surprised me. After all, I enjoyed the Chandler stories
just as much as the Heinlein stories. They were different, but
just as good.
However,
the fannish gods that reigned over this pre-commercial connish
world had decreed that ‘serious science fiction with hard
science and strong social messages’ was GOOD science fiction
and anything that hearkened back to the days of blasters and metal
brassieres was BAD science fiction. It was the kind of scifi that
the entire mundane world pointed to when they wanted to make fun
of us. (This was the era of SF fandom that refused to accept ‘scifi’
as an appellation; even whispering the word would get you beat
about the head and shoulders with a hardback copy of Spinrad’s
Bug Jack Barron by a member of the Dorsai Irregulars.)
Unfortunately
for me, I had chosen to like a writer who was NOT COOL.
Although
I continued to read Chandler’s works whenever I could find
them (mostly at the used book store), I did so with a guilty pleasure.
I couldn’t let any of my fannish friends know that I actually
liked a ‘bad’ writer.
A
few years later, several local fans and I formed a science fiction
club (PSFS if you must know – the Philadelphia Science Fiction
Society, entirely separate from the decades old club that runs
the Philcons – and despite the fact that most of the members
hailed from Cherry Hill New Jersey. I think we decided against
NJSFS because there was just no way to pronounce the acronym).
One of the other members (I’ll not reveal his name just
in case he’s still embarrassed by his admission) also liked
Chandler and our club discussed both Heinlein and Chandler , sometimes
even in the same sentence (or, to be more historically accurate,
in the same paragraphs and monologues).
It
was this experience that really taught me that fandom and science
fiction are what you make them, not the other way around. I was
no longer ashamed to admit that I liked A. Bertram Chandler’s
stories. Other people, and obviously at least one other fan, did
too – otherwise, what was happening to all of the copies
of his books that I wasn’t buying?
(I
think it was about this time that I was horrified to learn what
did happen to those remaindered books. They ground them up for
pulp! And to think that, like myself, there were probably thousands
of readers who would have gladly given a home to those poor, orphaned
and condemned books…)
I’ll
take a moment to give you a capsule review of Chandler’s
works so that you aren’t misled into believing that I bought
into the negative reviews in any fashion (as well as to illustrate,
briefly, just how wrong that impression was).
To
begin – Chandler was sufficiently avante garde for Harlan
Ellison to have commissioned a story from him for The Last Dangerous
Visions. (Its yet to see print and the story of LDV is a novel
unto itself. I have contacted Mr. Ellison in an attempt to free
the story from its bondage, to no avail. ((Harlan was nice on
the phone, but turned away my every effort and proposal. He claims
to not know the subject matter of the story – entitled True
Believers – which I find hard to believe. More than likely
he is determined that not one iota of that story will surface
until the day LDV hits the racks. If you must know, I offered
to pay for an entire non-existent copy of LDV, no strings attached,
for the sole privilege of being able to read over the story and
take notes. This offer I made in all seriousness, knowing how
Harlan feels about rights and royalties. I offered to return any
copies and even to sign a non-disclosure agreement, all of which
shattered against the stony wall of Ellison’s refusal. Of
course he is entirely within his rights to do what he did, as
I am within my rights when I continue to try and find ways to
get ahold of that story.))
Chandler’s
early work was snatched up and encouraged by none other than John
W. Campbell Jr. – the ‘father of the golden age of
science fiction’. (This was in 1944, smack dab in the middle
of Campbell’s discovery and development of other stellar
lights in the science fiction galaxy – Asimov, Clarke, Heinlein…)
Obviously, at least in Campbell’s mind, Chandler’s
work was most definitely NOT the old swashbuckling, galaxy-destroying
sci-fi that the esteemed editor had rejected.
The
readers of the time responded in kind. At least one fan notes
that Chandler’s stories routinely ranked 2nd and 3rd in
the reader’s response section of Astounding/Analog magazine.
A recent internet find reveals that Chandler was well-liked enough
by the readers of Astounding and Analog to have garnered a place
among the top 50 writers who’s works were ranked by the
magazine’s reader survey section. That’s a top 50
writers ranking for those who have appeared in the magazine from
Campbell’s advent until 2002!
Chandler’s
themes were of a cutting-edge variety also. His early work is
summed up in the classic Giant Killer – a story told from
the point of view of a mutated, intelligent rat, living inside
the walls of a starship. The viewpoint is consistent and the characters
interestingly and creatively non-human. Giant Killer is, most
likely, the seminal 'mutated somethings tangle with humanity'
story. It is unfortunate that so many others have followed Chandler's
lead with this theme over the years that the original can seem
trite and cliche. In at least partial recognition of this story's
contribution to the genre, it was nominated for a Retro-Hugo award
in 1996, some fifty years after it was originally published.
His
later works (once he broke out of the solar system) mostly tended
to focus on the Rim Worlds (planets on the edge of the galaxy)
and a few popular characters – The Empress Irene, Derek
Calver and John Grimes of the Federation Survey Service.
The
primary thing that sets Chandler apart from most of his contemporaries
(and the thing that no doubt caught Ellison’s eye) was his
ability to deal with sexual matters in a realistic, adult and
sensible way. Sex is one of the universal motivators and Chandler
did not shy away from injecting it into his stories. (Indeed,
one of his first novels – Spartan Planet – deals with
a planet inhabited entirely by male humans. Consider that this
novel was first published in 1966 and you will have some idea
of how much on the forefront of ‘modern science fiction’
Chandler really was.) On at least two occasions, his stories were
bounced or delayed from publication because of an editor’s
concern over its sexual content.
Another
favorite theme was Chandler’s version of ‘the world
as myth’. Several stories portray the author himself (or
a close doppelganger named for one of his pseudonyms) meeting
‘alternate reality versions’ of himself, or influencing
a future by interacting with fictional characters, or becoming
a character in someone else’s myth. In his novel ‘The
Dark Dimensions’, he even manages to borrow some characters
from other authors (notably Dominic Flandry of Anderson’s
series of the same name). If you thought the preceding description
of world-as-myth was confusing, try reading one of them and keeping
track of which John Grimes is who…
And
finally, although it was most likely not intentional, he is one
of the few science fiction authors of his era who has created
a coherent, cohesive and well-developed ‘future history’.
Chandler’s version, although never collected in the frontpiece
of any of his books (like Heinlien’s future history or Niven’s
history of known space) may very well have been the first one
ever invented. Again, the good money is on Chandler NOT having
created a future history deliberately. Rather, he seems to have
fallen into it and allowed his creativity to reign. But the evidence
is to be found in the books themselves; characters refer to historical
events that are to be found in other stories, technology is consistent
and evolves with time, even the window dressing remains consistent.
At least some of this is due to his deliberate ‘filling
in’ of his primary character’s past (he had all of
the ‘later’ stories to refer to), but not all.
A
short summary of Chandlers works would be ‘good, rollicking
tales’. His stories are about everyday people and it may
be the normalcy of the environments he wrote in that helped keep
him from ‘grand master’ status. His main characters
used intelligence and luck (and the occasional deus ex machine)
to solve their problems, rather than inventing whole new branches
of science. It may very well be that Chandler’s primary
appeal – creating futuristic environments that feel like
home – is also the very thing that kept him from achieving
greater prominence. Chandler’s stories are like a favorite
pair of slippers. They’re old and worn, but they fit perfectly.
Its unlikely that you would ever bring them up in conversation.
If you did, it would be to remark on how comfortable they are.
Chandler’s
absence from the US convention scene (he was GOH on several occassions,
but didn't make regular appearances like Asimov or Heinlein) may
also have contributed to his secondary status. This is entirely
understandable as he was working his ships, plying the waters
of New Zealand, Australia and Asia. Authors in the US had many
more opportunities to politic, to get to know editors and publishers,
to keep their names appearing regularly in the fan magazines,
the convention program books.
Over
the years he has become a Grand Master of Australian SF; they’ve
even named an annual award after him, but at this time it would
take a concerted effort to get his name raised to the top shelf
where it really belongs.
I
always liked his stories and I’ll always continue to do
so.
Which
brings us back to the concordance.
About
five years ago I was looking for something to do. I have an unfortunate
habit of trying to turn all of my hobbies into businesses. (Some
efforts have been successful, others not.) As I was between hobbies,
I had a chance to reflect on that habit and I decided that what
I really needed to do was to immerse myself in some meaningless
activity that I most consciously was not going to make into a
business. The fun and enjoyment would stem from the fact that
I was just doing it (whatever it would be) to do it.
I
thought at first of working on something that was of a relatively
popular nature, but then I decided that it would be more fun to
work on a project that centered on an overlooked subject. I soon
realized that Chandler was one such subject. I had often speculated
on whether his Rim Worlds/John Grimes stories were written in
a shared universe, or if they were all stand-alones, even if they
involved some of the same characters.
I
went to my library and pulled everything Chandler and began reading.
I then went searching for other works not in my collection and
began collecting. (Ebay was a new and marvelous tool at this time.)
I then decided that I needed a database to keep track of characters,
histories and the trappings found in the stories.
I
was well into this first incarnation when I lost the computer
all of the data had been stored in. The only thing that remained
was an improved Chandler section in the library and, out of frustration
(I’d gotten most of the extant Grimes novels into that database)
I gave up. (There’s nothing worse than re-writing something
that's already been written, especially when it has to be rewritten
exactly the same way as the earlier version, and MOST especially
when you aren't under any real compulsion to do it.)
Then
all kinds of personal things happened (not the least of which
was getting married) and time went by.
Several
months ago I found some original notes from that first effort
and dove back into Chandlerania. I’ve recreated the database
and am making fine progress. (This time its backed up on CD.)
I’ve met some other Chandler fans and have begun to correspond
with more.
The
remainder of this site features all kinds of things relating to
A. Bertram Chandler’s works and my concordance of those
works. To find out the scope of the concordance, please see that
section.
I’m
having fun with the data gathered so far; for example, you’ll
find an arrivals and departures page that lists all of the tramlines
I’ve found so far in the books. If you want to book a trip
from Earth to the Rim, that’s the place to find out how
you’re going to get there.
The
various data pages are works in progress. As I add to the databases,
this information will be updated on the site. At the present time,
these lists are really nothing more than names and hasty definitions
– I’ll be rewriting all of them when the data entry
phase has been completed.
There
are many people who deserve thanks and mentions, so I’ll
do that here:
Todd
Bennett
posted the first series of Chandler’s pages on the web and
compiled a pretty good bibliography of the works. His ‘story
order’ of the Grimes and Rim World is pretty accurate and
has been published inside the Science Fiction Book Club’s
omnibus editions of the John Grimes stories. We can’t find
Todd these days – his website is only viewable at the internet
archive.org site.
Keith
Curtis
of Dreamstone Press in Australia worked with Chandler’s
widow – Susan (with whom Bertram co-authored
at least one story and a person I hope one day to meet) –
to publish a collection of stories in a special edition entitled
“From Sea to Shining Star”, which is an invaluable
resource of some of Chandler’s more difficult to find stories,
and which features an absolutely fantastic piece of cover art
by Nick Stathopoulos, who has graciously
given me permission to reproduce both the cover and interior illustrations
on this site - a task I hope to complete in the relatively near
future.
David
Kellerher
is another Australian who’s keeping the torch lit. His www.bertramchandler.com
page has the most complete bibliography of Chandler’s works,
several electronic editions of stories, collections of non-fiction
writings by Chandler and a wealth of other materials. David has
been very helpful in my efforts.
Joshua
Bilmes
of the JABerwocky Literary Agency – is the agent for Chandler’s
estate and has also been helpful in trying to track down stories
and providing additional information about Chandler.
Ross
Pavlac
was an early fan of Chandler and also gathered together a bibliography
and some other interesting materials for a convention program
book honoring Chandler’s Guest appearance there. Ross unfortunately
passed away several years ago. I’d met him a few times at
various conventions and I’m saddened by his passing. |