An
Interview With A. Bertram Chandler
By Darrell Schweitzer
Copyright
(c) 1983 by Darrel Schweitzer. Reprinted by permission of the
author.
This
interview was originally published in the March 1983 issue of
Amazing Stories Magazine, and is reprinted here as it originally
appeared in that magazine, with the exception of a change in
formatting. An annotated version of this same interview will
eventually appear below the original.
A.
Bertram Chandler is probably the best known Australian science
fiction writer. He is British by birth, but has resided in Australia
for many years. As should be obvious to anyone who reads one
of his stories, Chandler has had much experience at sea. He
has served in the British, Australian, and New Zealand merchant
navies, and has consistently made use of this background in
his stories and novels, notably the Rim Worlds/John Grimes series.
He began writing for John W. Campbell’s Astounding during
World War II and was a regular contributor to the early New
Worlds. His novels began to appear in the late 1950s and have
been doing so regularly ever since. He retired form the sea
in 1975, and has been able to devote more time to writing as
a consequence. Ace Books has recently begun to reissue the Grimes
series in chronological order, two novels to a volume. His most
recent novel is Matilda’s Stepchildren.
Q:
Why
did you turn to science fiction, rather than sea stories?
Chandler: Because many years ago, I was
accused by the late John Campbell of writing sea stories thinly
disguised as science fiction. Which I think I do.
Q: What do you see as the similarities
between life in an ocean-going vessel and life in a spaceship?
Chandler: It was many years ago, in fact
during World War II, that Heinlein said that only people who
know ships can write convincingly about spaceships. And I think
it is largely true that one finds an author with no sea experience
tends to man his spaceships with hordes of useless ratings falling
over each other. He hasn’t the faintest idea about a ship’s
routine or organization. Now essentially, a spaceship, the real
spaceship of the future, as opposed to our present puddle-jumpers,
will be like a surface ship of today inasmuch as she will be
going a long way in a long time, and inasmuch as the crew will
have just one thin sheet of metal between them an eternity.
Q: Then isn’t it much closer to
a submarine?
Chandler: Actually, the submarine is a
spaceship, because you have human beings inside a metal shell,
living and working in an utterly hostile environment.
Q: What drew you to science fiction originally?
Chandler: Science fiction is something—the
talent for it and the liking for it—that you’re
born with. A few people acquire the taste in later years, but
most of us, I think, were actually born science fictioneers,
either as readers or as writers.
Q: When did you get started? The earliest
story of yours that I’ve seen was “Giant Killer,”
in a 1945 Astounding.
Chandler: I think my earliest story was
about 1942 or 1943. It was written shortly after the USA entered
World War II. At the time I was an officer in one of the leading
English liner companies. The normal peacetime trade was between
England and Australasia. And with World War II, we were shunted
off our normal tramlines, and so I paid my first visit to New
York. In New York, I thought that I would like to meet the editor
of what was then my favorite magazine, Astounding Science Fiction.
So I went trotting around to the sacred edifice, and was ushered
into the sacred presence, and John said that because of the
war, with so many of his authors being involved in military
service, he was very short of stories, and perhaps, as a faithful
reader, I might oblige. And the next time in New York I had
with me the manuscript of a very short story, which I’d
hammered out painfully over about a fortnight. The same thing
today would have taken on the outside two mornings’s work,
or working right though, a day’s work. So I presented
this precious opus to John in person, and said, “Well
I suppose I’d better leave return postage,” and
he said, “Don’t worry. I’ll send it back.”
The ship proceeded back to the U.K. in a very slow convoy, and
among the mail awaiting me was not the return manuscript, but
a check. And so, for the remaining years of World War II, I
was writing short stories practically exclusively for Astounding.
Then there were a few rejects which I was able to sell to the
other magazines in the field. During my career I have had very
few short stories or novels which have failed to sell to somebody
sometime. I’ve been very lucky.
Q: Did Campbell give you story ideas the
way he did to a lot of other writers?
Chandler: To take one example, the story
“Giant Killer,” which by rather too many people
is regarded as a sort of classic: I got the idea because at
the time I was second mate of a steamer which was infested with
rats. In fact it was so bad that they used to keep a .22 rifle
on the bridge, so that on moonlit nights the officer on watch
could amuse himself potting at rats. So I got the idea of “Giant
Killer” and the first version was called “Derelict.”
It was written from the viewpoint of the crew of a ship which
finds this derelict adrift in space and on boarding her finds
that she is infested with mutated rats. John read this and said,
“Well, no, no, no. It’s your story, and I want you
to write it, and I want it my way. Try it again from the viewpoint
of the original crew.” I am very sorry that the carbon
copies of the second version have long been lost. That was a
real boot. It was called “The Rejected,” the title
coming from The International: “Arise ye starving from
your slumbers, Arise rejected of the earth.” It had a
Russian spaceship, and I stressed the irony of this crowd of
mutinous mutants seething under the comrades’ feet. The
atmosphere was simply lovely. There were portraits of the Little
Red Father, red plush frames. There was even sex, which for
those days was rather unusual. And John read this masterpiece
and said, “Chandler, I would point out to you that Astounding
Science Fiction is neither Thrilling Romances, nor a monthly
edition of The Daily Worker. Take it away and do it again from
the viewpoint of the rats.” And I said, “What?”
And he said, “Yes, you heard me.” So next time in
New York, I had the first thousand words of “Giant Killer.”
By that time I was a regular weekend guest at John’s home
parties and at this one there were present George O. Smith,
Ted Sturgeon, and Lester Del Rey. And so I passed around the
pages of the first thousand words, and everybody asked where
the rest was, and I said, “This is all there is unless
John says that he’ll buy it.” And so John said that
he would buy it when it was finished, and that was that.
Q: Which version do you prefer?
Chandler: Actually “Giant Killer”
is a very good story, but I would have loved to have seen the
second one in print. Now probably if I read it today I would
think that it was horribly over-written. It probably was, too.
Q: Did you ever find it restricting when
Campbell wanted it done his way?
Chandler: I think that among authors of
my age group, the majority of us think that Campbell was God.
There were only a few who had rather unkind words to say regarding
hi. But John’s judgments were very sound, and his recommendations
were certainly well worth following.
Q: Eventually you did drift away from
him. Why was that?
Chandler: I’d say one reason was
that in those days for some obscure reason Street & Smith
{The publishers of Astounding] insisted on buying all rights,
and if one sold to Street & Smith, it meant the story was
frozen; whereas if I sold the original to one of the other magazines
in New York, I could send one carbon to a magazine in England
and another to one in Australia. In fact in the case of “Giant
Killer,” because my agent omitted to get the rights back
from Street & Smith, the story has been anthologized three
times, and I’ve only been paid once, and the only reason
I was paid was because the person doing the anthology approached
me first.
Q: Eventually you got into novels. Did
you ever sell novels to Astounding?
Chandler: The Rim of Space appeared in
Astounding as “To Run the Rim.” The novel version
was an expansion. And The Ship From Outside appeared as “The
Outsider” and was also expanded. But I’ve never
actually had a full-length novel published in Astounding.
Q: Have you found any other editor to
be as helpful as Campbell was?
Chandler: I don’t think so. I’d
say actually that the circumstance was that I had Campbell when
I was just beginning, and since then, with other editors, I’ve
been large enough to stand on my own feet.
Q: In other words they take what you give
them rather than tell you what they want?
Chandler: I’ve had occasional arguments,
but I’ve usually won.
Q: Do you miss the interaction with the
editor as the story is actually being written? Would you still
find it useful?
Chandler: As long as it’s a good
editor, as Campbell was, but now and again one strikes editors
who can be described only as officious. Officious editing is
very annoying. You may recall that during the reign of a certain
person, who shall be nameless, in the editorial chair of Galaxy,
every writer was screaming to high heaven about the way in which
their stories had been mangled. It wasn’t Fred Pohl. He
was a very good editor. It wasn’t Jim Baen either, so
[laughs] you can sort of bracket, one short and one over, and
you’ve got what comes between. He was utterly a pain in
the ass.
Q: Do you want to be quoted as saying
that?
Chandler: Yes. {Laughs.] I actually fell
out with him over a short story, which was later expanded into
a full-length novel, The Broken Cycle, which was published by
Robert Hale in 1975 and by DAW in 1979. At the time I had running
concurrently in Galaxy what was in effect two series. There
was the young Mr. Grimes in the Survey Service. At the time
of The Broken Cycle, he was Lt. Commander. And there was the
somewhat elderly Commodore Grimes of the Rim Worlds. And in
The Broken Cycle Lt. Commander Grimes of the Survey Service
has an affair with a policewoman. This editor objected because
Grimes must be unfaithful to the beautiful Sonya. So I wrote
a rather sarcastic letter pointing out that there was a big
difference between a Lt. Commander in one service, two and a
half rungs up, and a Commodore in another service with one broad
band, and that Sonya was still very far in Lt. Commander Grimes’
future. I explained naval ranks in great detail, and I pointed
out that even Hornblower was unfaithful to his Lady Barbara
and that even Lady Barbara herself had a roll in the hay with
some Austrian count in Vienna. I fear that I was too sarcastic,
so I never sold another thing to Galaxy until there was a change
of editor.
Q: Has your approach to writing changed
over the years?
Chandler: Well, ever since he took charge,
Grimes has been, as it were, my mouthpiece. We share the same
biases, the same likes and dislikes, the same views.
Q: You mention that he ‘took charge.’
Did you originally plan to write this many Grimes stories, or
did the series just grow?
Chandler: Actually, Grimes started as
a very, very minor background character, and then, for some
reason, in Into the Alternate Universe, I decided that Grimes
should have a novel all to his little self. It was since then
that he started to really take charge. Then there has been some
confusion, because having established Grimes as a fairly senior
officer, I did the same as Forester did with Hornblower. I thought,
well, the man must have some background, and I went back in
time to chronicle the adventures and misadventures and misdeeds
of earlier days. The first of these novels was The Road to the
Rim, in which Grimes is just starting his career in the Survey
Service. And then I had, as I said, the two series running concurrently.
I’d write a Survey Service when I felt like it, and a
Rim Worlds Grimes when I felt like it, and then readers started
complaining about the great gap between the two Grimeses. Why
did Grimes leave the Survey Service? I was hinting now and again
that there had been some really outrageous misadventure which
led to his being emptied out. So I wrote The Big Black Mark,
which I thought filled the gap. Then the various readers screamed
that the gap had not been filled. So I am still trying to fill
the gap. The more I write to fill the gap, the more it stretches.
Q: Do you see yourself writing Grimes
indefinitely?
Chandler: Yes. But apart from everything
else, the only publisher who has insisted in having things in
their proper order has been Hayakawa Shobo in Tokyo, and the
series has such a big following in Japan, that if I dropped
Grimes or killed him off, there would be the most dreadful screaming.
Q: Is it true that none of the Grimes
books have been published in Australia?
Chandler: None have as books. In the last
two Paul Collins anthologies, there was Grimes Among the Gourmets
[Other Worlds, Void Pubs., 1978] and in the following [Alien
Worlds, 1979] there were several excerpts from Matilda’s
Stepchildren, which has yet to be accepted by any publisher
in the USA, although it’s been published in London and
Tokyo.
Q: Are the stories not popular in Australia,
or is there not much of a science fiction publishing industry
there?
Chandler: There is not much of a publishing
industry period. The only two novels I have had published in
Australia have been False Fatherland, which has been published
by Horwitz, and with the title changed, published as a serial
by Fantastic in the USA [As Spartan Planet March-May 1968] and
then by Dell and later by Ace – and of course the money
made by the American and Japanese sales was far in excess of
the money made on the Australian sale – and the other
one was a rather good novel, very well reviewed, which was an
absolute flop from the financial viewpoint, The Bitter Pill,
published by Wren in 1974.
Q: The Bitter Pill was much different
from what you usually write. Do you think that the failure was
because the readers were expecting Grimes?
Chandler: Actually, what I think is that
if Dennis Wren had published the damn thing in soft cover, it
would have sold much better.
Q: What are your writing methods like?
Chandler: When I’m driven to it
by hunger….Well, actually, with a novel, I have a good
idea of the beginning, and I know the end toward which I am
working, and what happens in between is anybody’s business.
Q: You come upon it as you’re writing
it?
Chandler: For the last one I sold, The
Star Loot, upcoming from DAW, as an experiment I used the I-Ching
as a plotting machine. It worked quite well.
Q: Did you toss coins or the little sticks?
Chandler: Coins.
Q: How do you plot with something like
that? I’d think it would tend to randomize things.
Chandler: You toss the coins, and get
an idea as to the course of action, carry on until you grind
to a halt, then toss the coins again. The results were quite
satisfactory.
Q: Are you going to do it that way again?
Chandler: I might. No, actually, the book
which I am working on now, To Rule the Refugees, is based closely
on the Rum Rebellion in New South Wales, just like The Big Black
Mark is based very closely on the mutiny aboard the Bounty.
In each case, Grimes plays the part of Blight, and so this new
one is based very closely on when Captain Bligh was governor
of New South Wales and was mutinied against by his garrison.
Q: To be mutinied against twice, he must
have been doing something wrong.
Chandler: No, he wasn’t. Bligh,
throughout his career, was an outstanding seaman and navigator,
and in each case he had the misfortune to be afflicted by really
bad bastards: in the Bounty affair, mainly Fletcher Christian,
and in the Rum Rebellion, those horrible bastards of the New
South Wales Corps. On each occasion Bligh was absolutely in
the right.
Q: I suppose the other guy is romanticized
as being the underdog.
Chandler: Yes. In the case of the Rum
Rebellion, the early garrisons of New South Wales were taken
from the Royal Marines, and they weren’t very satisfactory.
So a special corps was formed, consisting in all ranks, of absolute
throwouts from the British Army. All the really bad types. The
officers of the New South Wales Corps were up to their eyebrows
in every racket, and in fact became the robber barons of that
period. And Bligh was for the small farmers and even the convicts,
and officers of New South Wales Corps resented this. After the
Rum Rebellion, the ringleaders were court-martialed and got
off far too lightly – they should have been shot. There
were other governors, and as long as the New South Wales Corps
were organized as a military party, they were a pain in the
ass to every governor. They were making the governor’s
lives miserable. Then of course these people, who grabbed vast
stretches of land, became the ancestors of the so-called best
families of New South Wales, who, in order to sweeten the memories
of their own ancestors, have done their damndest to blacken
Bligh’s memory ever since. That’s the origin of
all the unfounded stories about the bullying, tyrannous, arrogant
Captain Bligh.
Q: Have you thought of doing a straight
historical book to set things right?
Chandler: Well, oddly enough, the project
on which I am now engaged, Kelly Country, is a sort of historical
novel. In fact there were screams from the Australian science
fiction community when the names of those successful in obtaining
fellowships were announced late last year. I was listed as having
been granted a two-year senior fellowship to write a historical
novel. Everybody screamed, “Chandler’s sold out
to the establishment,” Whereas in actuality what I am
writing is an “If” of history novel, which required
as much research as a straight history.
Q: How do you take a series of historical
events and turn them into science fiction without the result
seeming like historical fiction in a thin disguise?
Chandler: Well, the whole point was that
there was not, in actuality, an Australian war of independence
in 1880. I shan’t change the course of history. I shall
have the Australian war of independence breaking out in 1880.
I shall have a charismatic leader, who furthermore, had much
more imagination than the average general of his day: a leader
who would have the brains to grasp the fact that a steam-operated
gatling fun, which could have been used in those days –
Gatling was willing to make the things – would have a
far higher rate of fire than a hand-operated one, and furthermore
could have been of a much higher caliber; a man who would have
had the intelligence to use a far-fetched device, such as the
Andrews Airship, which actually flew successfully in the USA
in the 1860’s. The darned thing worked, but nobody took
it up.
Q: Lighter than air? Like a dirigible?
Chandler: Yes, lighter than air. It was
dirigible. It could be steered. It would go where it was supposed
to go. In fact, if you’ve read Grimes and the Great Race
I the April 1980 Isaac Asimov’s Science Fiction Magazine,
I have based the racing airships in that story on the Andrews
Airship. So from that, you get an idea as to how it worked.
It could have been used.
Q: What do you plan to do once you’ve
finished with Kelly Country?
Chandler: Kelly Country will require about
a year’s research and a year’s writing, of course
meanwhile I am being maintained by the Australian taxpayer in
the style to which I have become accustomed. Then, having finished
Kelly Country, I hope to sell it at a good price, because it
remains my property, after which, of course, I return to Grimes,
now that he’s had his long service leave.
Q: What do you find the most satisfactory
of anything you’ve done?
Chandler: I think that perhaps my favorite
is The Big Black Mark. As I said, that was based very closely
on Blight and the Bounty. Because, you see, there are certain
seamen who are, you might say, in my own private pantheon. My
favorite seamen, I suppose, are Matthew Benders; and of course
Cook; and Bligh; and the American Commodore Levi – he
was quite a lad – and of course Joseph Conrad, the finest
novelist of the English language; Dampier, the literary buccaneer;
and going back quite some years, Will Adams, who was the real
live character that James Clavell based his Major Blackthorne
on in Shogun.
Q: Presumably Conrad influenced you as
a writer. What other writers did?
Chandler: Regarding the use of words, even though I am an agnostic,
I’d say the King James version of the Bible.
Q: How about C.S. Forester?
Chandler: And of course Forester. Regarding
him, I didn’t realize for quite a while that Grimes was
one of his bastard sons. He’s had quite a few. Though,
oddly enough, I just don’t like any of the many imitation
Hornblowers. The only character, the only sea captain of that
period by another whom I like, is O’Brien’s Captain
Jack Aubrey. The same period as Hornblower, but one knows that
if the two met, they would hate each other. All the other imitation
Hornblowers are modeled far too closely on Hornblower.
Q: Did you ever have any contact with
Forester about Grimes being a bastard son of his character?
Chandler: No. I didn’t realize to
what an extent Grimes was modeled on Hornblower – it was
really quite unconscious p until, I would say, much later on,
when my wife, whenever she wanted to annoy me, would refer to
Grimes as Hornblower. “Not another Hornblower book, darling.”
Then I suddenly realized it, and I did what Forester did with
Hornblower. I decided to establish the character’s background
with The Road to the Rim which, as you may recall, was dedicated
to Admiral Lord Hornblower. This, oddly enough, led to a sharp
increase of Forester’s sales. Unluckily at that time,
he himself could no longer benefit. But his estate did. This
dedication also led to a sharp increase of his sales in Japan,
because Japanese readers, seeing the dedication, asked “Who
is Hornblower?” Then, of course, if you explained who
Hornblower was, they’d go and buy Hornblower books. {Laughs.]
Q: Are there any science fiction writers
you would consider to be an influence?
Chandler: Wells, of course.
Q: But none of the contemporaries?
Chandler: No. There are many whom I admire
very much indeed though.